The Case for Obama: A Vision to Move America Forward vs. Duplicitous Elitism

The 2012 Presidential election, simply put, is about vision. That is, which vision, President Obama’s, or Mr. Romney’s, will best move this country forward. In my opinion, it is the contrast of hope, optimism, growth and inclusion for all, of President Obama, versus the duplicity, flip flopping (read, lying) and indifference, if not outright hostility to half this country’s populous, of Mr. Romney. As President Obama stated when he closed the second Presidential debate “when he [Mitt] thought nobody was listening he said what he really felt--47% of the American people don't matter because all they want is a government hand out”. For Mr. Romney to now come back and say he cares about all Americans because he wants their vote is just disingenuous. Therefore, when given this choice in vision, I choose, and believe America should choose President Obama for a second term. For me, that President Obama should be the man to lead us forward for another four years was decided long ago. The progress he has made in his first four years is laudable in the absolute sense. Taken in context, and viewed relatively, the progress he has made is remarkable. In inheriting an economy on the brink of another Great Depression, and in four short years returning us to an economy of growth should be applauded. Moreover, despite constant attacks from the radical right, and a Congress that has tried to impede his every move, he has continued to govern as the President for all. The bible tells us that “without a vision the people will perish”. To better determine the right vision for America let us flesh out in a bit more detail, the above referenced visions: Romney: • More tax cuts for the rich • A land with less diversity under more strict immigration and affirmative action laws • Fewer social services for those who most need it including the elderly • A repeal of Universal health care and corresponding denial of access to millions of Americas who desperately need preventative and ongoing healthcare • Less choice for women in what to do with their bodies and laws that tell us who to love and how we can love them • Promises of economic growth and tax reform with no specifics stated • A vision where 47% of the citizens in this country don’t matter This does not sound like a compelling vision to me. How about President Obama? Obama: • Inclusion. 100% of Americans matter • A land where women’s rights are protected; where people are free to love who they want • Healthcare for all Americans as the President demonstrated with the passage of Universal Healthcare • Job growth and a strong economy. The President and his team have (i) saved us from a second Great Depression by putting in place a stimulus package, that among other things, saved the auto and banking industries and (ii) stopped the job losses that where occurring under Bush, and is now adding more than 100k jobs a month • A tax system where the rich pay their fare share and where a healthy middle class can exist; not a system where a millionaire like Romney pays 14% and our teachers, policemen and bus drivers pay 30-40% The contrast between these two visions could not be clearer. In Mr. Romney’s America, the middle class will further dissipate as the “haves” will continue, unchecked, to hold down the “have nots”. The tyranny of the majority will be law of the land. Finally, given how often Mr. Romney’s positions seem to change, there is no telling what further untold dangers await the American people if his vision is the one we follow. On the other hand, President Obama’s vision is about hope, optimism and rebuilding. While we, and he, must acknowledge that more hard work lies ahead, in President Obama’s America, there is an opportunity for us all to prosper. Given the President’s track record, his well defined vision that moves all of America forward, I believe he has stated the case for another four years, and a chance to finish the job he started. I believe we must cast our vote with President Barack Obama in this election.

Yes We Can, the Blueprint—How to Finish the Change We Started

The Audacity to Win

We won. I was reminded of the feeling that I and several other friends had the night we knew President Barack Obama had won the election for the President of the United States. Many of us, including me, played small parts in helping this victory happen. An African American had just become the 44th President of the United States. I recalled stepping outside to speak to my mother, a woman who had marched in the Civil Rights movement, and discussing what an historic moment we had just witnessed. We were both proud, but felt, in the final analysis, this victory would be viewed as hallow if we did not use it to make real change (i.e, pass broad laws that impact the majority of America and elect other similarly minded and diverse people at the local, state and federal levels). These feelings had been conjured up by the book I was reading on the way to the annual legislative meeting of the Congressional Black Caucus (“CBC”)—The Audacity to Win. Why exactly, it is, or was, audacious for an African American to have won the Presidency is a story for another time.

My feelings of excitement, happiness and desire to help make change that had been stirred by this powerful book were only re-enforced last night at the CBC Awards Gala when President Obama stepped on stage to speak to the crowd. Even before he spoke, one could feel the electricity in the room exuding from his person. Some, in the community, call it “swag”. Others say he has something special. Regardless, our President clearly has “it”. As he began his speech, everyone in the room could feel the same energy that had popularized what had become the President’s catch phrase during his run—“Yes We Can”. This excitement was bolstered by the President reviewing the many impressive accomplishments by his administration in their first 18 months. The excitement, however, was tempered by what the President called America being at the crossroads.

We are at the crossroads, as stated by the President, because despite having saved the country from another “Great Depression”, passed health care reform and brought an end to the Iraq war, the Republicans, and increasingly the Tea Party, feel the President is not doing a good job. Not only do they want undo many of the aforementioned changes, according to minority leader Boehner, they want to take the country back. This is where the irony gets rich. The last time the Republican minority felt this way, the then minority leader Gingrich, made a contract with America. I am not sure what Newt thought he would deliver under this contract, however, what ensued were eight years of policies that led America right off the cliff. On the day President Obama took office no other incoming President had faced so many challenges on so many different fronts: a crumbling economy, millions of Americans without jobs or healthcare, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and increasingly sour relations with the world’s other super powers. As the President mused last night, it is now pretty funny that “the people who drove the country off the cliff, then watched us while we expended blood, sweat and tears to push the car, that is America, almost back on the road, while they drank slurppies and talked about what a poor job we are doing, now want back the keys to the car”??? No, the President said, resiliently, you can not have the keys to the car back. I suppose this is why the President called our current position a crossroads. To stay with the car analogy, we can hand the keys back to the Republicans, and some of their Tea Party friends (whoever these folks are), put the car in reverse and go backwards, or we can leave the car with the people that have made change, continue in drive and go forward. A precarious position indeed.

To be clear, while change has been made, we must go further as a country. As the legendary community activist, Harry Belafonte stated “President Obama will drive change, but can not do it alone”. It is clear that true change can not be about one man acting alone, it must be about a Nation working together. Mr. Belafonte further observes that a contributing factor to our being at the crossroads may be that our generation is missing true activists. In other words, the millions of Americans that will work at a grassroots level to help make the change we all claim to want. Viewed against this lens, we must realize that being active every four years, usually during a Presidential election for many of us, is not sufficient. Real change is made on all three levels of government—local, state and federal. I believe we must work on all three levels, and do so continuously. To do otherwise, is to fail to participate in the process that on a daily basis impacts all of our lives. If we fail to participate, we can not then complain that the change we seek did not come.

Real Progress

Recently, I had an opportunity to hear a very senior Senator speak. He told a powerful story on the US economy. On the morning before AIG would be taken over by the US government, a group of the top leadership, from each party, Senators and Congress people were summoned to a meeting with the President and Treasury Secretary, to discuss AIG and the broader economy. It became clear that unless AIG, and as we know now, a few others, were assisted, in other words saved, by the government, not only would they fail, our entire economy would become unhinged. Markets would have plunged, there would have been panicked runs on banks, and unemployment would certainly head toward the 25-35% “Great Depression” levels. The phrase “to big to fail”, for me, now was clearly defined.

Viewed properly against the backdrop of having to make critical decisions concerning institutions that were viewed as “to big to fail”, the only choice for this President and his administration, as they took office was to act decisively, and to make those actions big and bold. What then, have been the results of these actions? Recently I was provided the opportunity to attend a White House briefing on these matters. I admit to being impressed by the breadth of what this administration has been able to accomplish, especially given that it has only been 18 months. A few of these accomplishments:

The Economy
$750+B in TARP Funds. 1/3rd deployed.
Financial industry saved from ruin. Many regulatory changes made to make sure the possibility of a similar collapse in the future is lessened.
US Auto industry back on its feet
Reversal of a jobless trend—moved from losing 700,000 jobs a month to an economy that is currently adding jobs
Tax incentives for businesses to create jobs
Passage of a small business jobs bill and related lending fund

To be fair, the administration must do a better job of providing metrics as to how this $750B has been spent, its exact stimulative effect and the rate at which jobs will grow. This seems more a matter of communication and marketing, than flawed policy, so I think, given their stance as active listeners, they will improve in this area. This point about greater visibility and communication may also be made about many of the other changes being made by the administration. In short, tell us more, and more often.

Healthcare
Passage of healthcare reform that provides basic healthcare to most Americans
Additional money for preventative services
Control of escalating healthcare costs
Elimination of the lifetime benefit exclusion

Foreign Relations
Ending of the Iraq war
Steps toward ending the Afghanistan war
Continued negotiations in the Middle East
Actions, by the EPA and DEO, to reduce our dependence on foreign oils

Education
$4B for educational initiatives
Focus on those poorest performing 2000 US schools
Focus on HBCUs
Funding for more Americans to pursue higher education

As an aside, I think the administration would be smart to pick up Michelle Rhee, if she is not retained by the new Mayor, as DC schools chief. Her brand of innovative and outside of the box thinking may be just what America needs to make systemic change to its educational systems.

Viewed through an objective lens, a great deal of progress has been made by this administration in its first 18 months. I think the President would acknowledge that more work remains. However, even acknowledging more work remains, it does appear that the foundation has been laid for further change. So then what remains? How do we achieve the change we all seek? On a related point, and as Duvall Patrick recently asked “how do we (also) guard the change we have achieved”?

The Path Forward—Being the “We”

During the process of electing President Obama many of us were fond of the quote “we are the we, that we have been waiting for”. To many, it signified that this was a movement, and this movement belonged to all of us. I believe we got off to a great start by getting President Obama elected. I wonder, however, if we have lived up to the “We” part of this change process since. To be fair, many, many Americans have continued to work hard in their communities for advancement. What does it say, however, when in California, for example, there was only a ~20% voter turn out in the June primary. To me it says a great many of us stopped, satisfied with having an African American President. We said to ourselves, “I worked hard, and maybe I will work hard again in 2011 or 2012 when it is time to get the President re-elected, however, until that time I have lots of other areas in my life that require attention”. I do not want to understate the difficulties of every day life. Although our economy has improved, many Americans still struggle with mortgages, joblessness and meeting basic needs. That said, to fully realize the change we seek, we will have to dig deep, work even harder…sacrifice.

John F. Kennedy said “pray not for easy lives, but for the strength to meet life’s challenges”. We must now summon this strength. We must all focus on protecting the advances that have been realized. Additionally, we must achieve a great turn out in the midterm elections, and continue getting America back to work. We have to get back to the same sort of grassroots actions that got President Obama elected: registering voters, getting voters to polls and microfinance initiatives that fund campaigns. To return to the example of California, if we turn out at 20% again in the fall elections, as opposed to the 70%+ rate at which we turned out in 2008, many leaders who would have continued to advance this change will lose: (i) Barbara Boxer will not be Senator; (ii) Jerry Brown will not be Governor; and (iii) Kamala Harris will not be Attorney General. On a related note, if we fail to act decisively and as a collective, there will be no African Americans in the US Senate. Kendrick Meek, Democrat, Florida, will need a Nation to achieve victory. We can not allow any of the aforementioned to become realities.
The change we seek is squarely in our hands. Our actions, or inaction, as the case may be, will determine the future of a generation. Will we act? Will we lead? Will “we” be the “we” that we have been waiting for? Let’s not put the car in reverse and go backwards. Our future can be bright if we strive. Let’s stay in drive and head toward an even brighter tomorrow

Obama’s Military Excellence

Obama’s Military Excellence, by Bryan R. Parker

President Obama’s early military performance has exceeded expectations. The President’s performance in Afghanistan, Iraq and now the Somali coast, shows that he has the judgment to lead our military. During his presidential run, Mr. Obama was routinely questioned regarding his readiness for being Commander in Chief. He responded, as evidenced by his vote against the Iraq war, that he had the requisite judgment to respond reasonably, effectively and with force when necessary. In his first 100 days he has, as promised, started a plan of withdrawal from Afghanistan, made a surprise visit to Iraq during his G20 summit to discuss transfer of power, and acted with great care and judgment in this most recent situation.

In the most recent situation in Somalia, President Obama said that force may be used “only if the captain’s (Richard Phillips) life was in imminent danger, and the opportunity was present for clear shots at each of the captors”. It is this nuanced, well reasoned approach that should earn President Obama his greatest applause. In contrast to the previous President, Mr. Obama did not rush in without regard to human life, instead he exercised appropriate caution, while being clear that in certain situations, force is indeed appropriate. With three shots, and in an instant, three captors were killed. The navy seals team, as directed by their President, restored order.

President Obama’s follow up, of course, will define his military legacy in the end. Now that we have escalated violence in the region, we can surely expect the pirates of the region to retaliate. To be consistent, and so these enemies will know that they will be met with force for these kind of actions, President Obama must remain committed to the region. At the time of this writing, the author has learned that four more ships had been captured. How Mr. Obama responds now will shape his evolving grade in Military 101.