What the Price of Milk has to do with Jobs in Oakland

Sobering Moment--Problem Deeper Than We Knew

On a recent evening I found myself at a local Oakland theatre watching the movie “Good Deeds”. The movie, beautifully set in San Francisco (could have been Oakland, but that will be a story for another blog), tells the story of a successful CEO cast in the wrong life and a single mother working as a corporate cleaning lady. In one very poignant scene, the cleaning lady asked the CEO if he knew the price of a gallon of milk. Sadly the CEO did not.

This story, for me, has many lessons—the divide between the haves and the have nots, the disconnect between Wall Street and Main Street, and the very real struggle the underemployed and jobless face each day. For millions of Americans, and thousands of Oaklanders, the price of milk represents a quandary. How do I feed my family? What choices do I make if I am very tight on money? What will I do without a job or a job that does not pay enough to maintain a decent standard of living? For these Americans/Oaklanders the rising price of milk and other necessities drives home a larger point of deeper despair. The larger point, we are all connected to this, and so to the solution in some meaningful way

Lengths of Despair

I was struck by a recent article in the New York Times entitled “How Far Would You Go for a Comeback”. The article tells the story of several men who have left their homes in Anywhere, USA, some of them on the brink of bankruptcy or homelessness, for jobs in the oil industry in Williston, ND. For these men, Williston, where the unemployment rate is 1% vs the national average of 8.3% (Oakland is at 16.5%), is a source of salvation allowing them to send money back home to their families thereby keeping their lives afloat. One, a trained cook, who at one time owned his own home, had been reduced to picking up cans, musing in the process “if we’d get $10 to $15, we used it, we did what we had to do”. Part of me admires this indomitable example of the American spirit. The other part of me is filled with profound sadness that able bodied men and women, who want to work, support themselves and their families, increasingly often, don’t have the option to do so. This is not the American dream.

Oakland is filled with people of similar resiliency. We recovered from the big earthquake of 1989, the Oakland Hills fires of 1991 and most recently the sit ins of Occupy Oakland. This resiliency, alone, has not adequately prepared us for the country’s current recession. This recession has proved to be a beast of considerably greater magnitude than the aforementioned tragedies. It has left our city with an unemployment rate of 16.5% or twice the national average. There are many reasons for this fact. David Simon, writer of the Wire, and winner of a MacArthur genius award grant, writes about the ghettoization of America. He asserts that many lower skilled jobs have been pushed to the outskirts or overseas. Additionally, for various other reasons (perception of dangerous city and an out of control crime problem, too much bureaucracy at the city level, lack of a favorable tax climate and perception around level of disposable income of city’s residents available for purchase of company goods and services) we have seen other companies relocate from Oakland or out of California taking precious jobs with them.

This joblessness has pushed up both crime and general feelings of desperation in our city. What are we to do? I remember growing up in the shadows of the Bay Area, the child of a single mother facing similar struggles. My mother dug deep, sometimes working two jobs. She made sure I had access to good schools. These schools provided me access: access to a good college and a law school. Ultimately theses schools led to good jobs. Assuming we make some fundamental changes to our primary education system, I believe we can have similar experiences here in Oakland.

There is Hope (for Oakland)

There must be personal accountability to be sure—secure additional training, ensuring we are involved in our schools and children’s scholastic endeavors, demonstrating a willingness to share costs such as healthcare with businesses and engage in community policing to help make our neighborhoods safer. We, as the residents of Oakland, must be willing to do whatever it takes to get this city back on its feet. Demonstrating such a “cant fail attitude” through actions such as the above in a vacuum are likely not enough. There is also a role for government and business. Oakland has many pluses that should attract business: a largely educated workforce—colleges (Berkeley and Cal State East Bay), community colleges (Peralta), unions that train many workers in trades, a solid transportation system and access to a water front. We also have a Port and sports teams that could also be greater engines of economic growth.

We must aggressively market our positives to attract businesses if we want well paying jobs in our city. We must support our Mayor and her economic development team in this activity. We can do this through the “personal accountability” actions above, participating in the Mayor’s block by block program, and encouraging the companies we work for to come to Oakland. I have done this with my own company. My company is now in the process of building a location in East Oakland that will provide 70-100 healthcare based jobs. Imagine if we all made a concerted effort to do this kind of outreach. As the current Chair of the Oakland Workforce Investment Board I believe we have what it takes to succeed. It will take a material number of jobs to reduce our 16.5% unemployment rate.

We must be bold and audacious in attaching this number. A few examples:
• Appropriate tax breaks for small business so that may create jobs
• A unified effort, including a healthy Oakland effort where we are take better care of our health, that reduces healthcare costs and makes it more attractive for businesses to provide jobs
• Using our unique attributes as a city as real sales tools to attract businesses that can hire thousands of workers at a time
• Doubling or tripling the size of our police force and leveraging technology (like Shotspotter) and advanced data techniques to combat our crime problem and combat the perception that our city is an unsafe place for workers to work
• Organizing a standing business council that the Mayor may rely on for real, tangible ideas; this can be done as a roundtable with our chambers and labor councils as well
• Ensuring that our city government continues to build diversity and attract people, both elected and employees, with deep budget and economic experience
• Work to develop a more efficient government, with a surplus, where hard choices are made to encourage savings and the creation of a surplus, and discourages spending where certain items cannot be readily paid for

I do not claim to have all the ideas, but these are a start. I believe we can achieve our goals through hard work and concerted effort. However, until we take such actions, dare to be bold and audacious in our thinking, for many Oaklanders, like many Americans more generally, the price of milk will continue to matter—a lot!

Rome (I Mean Oakland) is Burning!

Rome (I Mean Oakland) is Burning
By Bryan R. Parker

Oakland—A City Adrift

It is with great sadness and a heavy heart that I write this blog. Four Oakland Police Officers lie dead—Mark Dunakin, Ervin Romans, Daniel Sakai and John Hege. These officers, victims of a senseless, violent attack carried out by Lovell Mixon, an ex-convict who was at the time of the killings being sought on violations of his parole. Today, our city, Oakland, honors these officers at a memorial at the Oracle Area. It is right that we celebrate these fallen heroes, these men who bravely defended our city and each of us as citizens.

Despite, what I am sure will be touching tributes, these men can never be brought back. For their families, friends and fellow officers, there can never be true solace. When taken together with Oakland’s rising overall homicide rate, tragedies like the Oscar Grant shooting, and the poor state of our economy we can see Oakland in its true context—a city on fire, seemingly adrift without a clear solution in sight.

The Meaning and Solutions

What then, does all of this mean for our city? Our Mayor would say that it is up to us, the citizens of Oakland, to stem this tide of violence and correct the city’s economy. I saw him speak these words at a recent State of the City Address. The Mayor is partially right. That is, we as citizens must rise to the occasion and assist in forming solutions to these pressing problems. However, the fact that the citizens of Oakland must be held to a higher standard of action, at this time, does not abdicate our Mayor of his responsibilities. Just, as in ancient Rome, there was no excuse for Nero fiddling while his city burned around him, so too is there no excuse for our Mayor not taking more decisive action at this time of crisis. Mr. Dellums must stand tall at this time, and offer concrete solutions and not just rhetoric. Mr. Dellums was a warrior for more than 20+ years as a congressman for our area, bringing tens of millions of dollars to California, and leading countless programs that helped our community. He must recall that spirit now!

I believe that the current situation, if left unchecked, has a high potential for escalating into further violence, thereby further tearing our city apart. Mr. Dellums must start by leading the creation of more jobs in Oakland and attracting a greater number of businesses to our city. As we have witnessed from history, lack of jobs and money are often precursors to crime, and crime in general is often a precursor to more violent crime. Given this trend, Mr. Dellums must issue a zero policy on violent crime—regardless of who carries it out. In addition, he must work with the state and federal governments to enforce stricter gun control. While I am a believer and defender of 2nd Amendment Rights, there is no justifiable reason for an ordinary citizen, as did Mr. Mixon, to possess an AK 47 (military assault rifle). Further, Mr. Dellums must work with those same groups to repair our broken parole and penal systems. Implementing programs like gps tracking of parolees, and having better programs in prison that ready ex-prisoners for re-entry into society are obvious starters.

The citizens and the police force must assist our Mayor in this enormous undertaking. Citizens can work with the Mayor and the Police, like the 100 Black Men of the Bay Area, of which I am a board member, are doing to find peaceful, non-violent solutions. Citizens, who wish to protest, must do so in a non-violent way. In addition, we should not celebrate people like Mr. Mixon as martyrs, rather recognize and appropriately deal with them as criminals. Lastly, even during this time of understandable sadness, our police force must carry out their duties with compassion and dignity. Any thoughts of retribution will ring hollow in the community and only serve to further divide us.

Takeaways
We must be ever mindful of the lessons of the great Ghandi who urged us “to be the change we seek”. We must come together and seek solutions as a community. If we do not, and continue to give in to hatred, anger, mistrust and even retribution, our city will be torn apart. Limb by limb, the very fabric that underpins the fiber of our city, will be torn to shreds. If and when this happens, we risk anarchy, increased violence and further economic despair. If however, we rally together, support our Mayor as he implements concrete solutions, and do our parts to be agents of change, our city can climb out of this tragedy—better, stronger, wiser, and ready to move forward and capitalize on the great potential that is Oakland.

J. Alfred Smith Jr.—the Right Pastor for Our Times

J. Alfred Smith Jr.—the Right Pastor for Our Times
by Bryan R. Parker

After much thought, deliberation and prayer (yes prayer), I am guided to support the Reverend J. Alfred Smith Jr. as the next Senior Pastor of Allen Temple Baptist Church. I am convinced that Reverend Smith Jr. is the right man, at the right time, to lead our church spiritually and otherwise, as we seek to build upon the great legacy of Allen Temple in the community, and move our church to the next level. I understand that my recommendation, this choice and indeed this confirmation, should it take place, has been fraught with controversy. Below, I share of few of my thoughts as to why I believe we should support Pastor Smith, Jr. as our next Senior Pastor.

We just completed a week of town hall style meetings in which the congregation was able to interact with and ask questions of Pastor Smith, Jr. In response to this author’s question of whether Pastor Smith, Jr. would still be the best candidate for Allen Temple even if his name were other than “Smith”, Pastor Smith Jr. provided two telling responses. One, as will be discussed below, he set forth the positive aspects of his association with his father. Two, he said that he was not the right person to answer the question. This question, was a question for God, and for the congregation in their faithfulness to answer. He asked us to pray, as would he, reasoning that God would guide us to the correct choice. Here we are reminded, that despite being in a season of elections, the selection of a Senior Pastor is a bit different. The selection of a Senior Pastor is not a perfectly secular process. The old adage that we “walk by faith” must guide us in instances such as the current one. It is in his answer to this very pointed question that we see Pastor Smith, Jr.’s truth spiritual depth.

Pastor Smith, Jr, makes reference to the “four callings of man” from Reinhold Niebuhr. Niebuhr, the evangelical scholar, I believe in his seminal work “Moral Man and Immoral Society” writes of four callings of man. The calling that is most relevant here is the calling of man to the church. I believe Pastor Smith, Jr. has been called by God to lead our church at this time. As a testament to his faith, I also believe Pastor Smith, Jr. is ready to head this call.

How then do we answer the charge by some of nepotism. Nepotism is defined as patronage bestowed or favoritism shown on the basis of family a relationship, as in business and politics. Some have asserted charges of nepotism in the potential selection of Pastor Smith, Jr., given that is father has been Senior Pastor of Allen Temple for more than 40 years. I do not believe the potential elevation of Pastor Smith, Jr. is a case of nepotism. I believe, rather, as I will set forth more fully below, that Pastor Smith, Jr.’s candidacy stands on his own merits. That said, Pastor Smith, Jr, has benefited from his relationship with his father to be sure. In this instance, this benefit is not a bad thing, and in fact, not only inures to benefit of Pastor Smith, Jr., but also to the church as a whole. To be more specific, Pastor Smith, Jr. by virtue of his relationship, and growing up in Allen Temple, understands, probably more deeply than any candidate under consideration, the traditions, mores and psyche of Allen Temple. He has also learned how to build and use relationships in the broader community for the benefit of the church. Moving forward, clearly his closeness with the Senior Smith will aid in his smooth transition, and in buttressing him on any of the aspects of the position for which he might not be quite ready. There is real merit to Allen Temple having a pastor who understands its history, traditions and relationships, and who can hit the ground running. Certainly such a situation lends itself toward increasing the odds that we reach our goals, both spiritual and secular, with greater speed and more certainty. We must still ask ourselves, what makes Pastor Smith, Jr. the man to shoulder such an awesome responsibility.

The answer to why Pastor Smith, Jr. is the right man, for right now, to lead our church has been shaped over a lifetime of service. Pastor Smith, Jr., as discussed, has grown up in Allen Temple. He has directly had a hand in shaping several of the ministries of our church including: home visits, elderly care, AIDS, credit union/repair, drugs and alcohol and prison. Over the past six years he has served as Senior Pastor of Antioch Baptist Church in San Jose, Ca. As Marvin Sapp sings in the song “Never Would Have Made It”, these six years have made Pastor Smith, Jr. “stronger, wiser, better”. During his time as Senior Pastor of Antioch Baptist, he has added real depth and weight to his preaching. He has also continued his commitment to the ministries. Further, Pastor Smith, Jr. has demonstrated that he has the kind of energy and commitment to empowering the next generation of leadership that will be required to not only keep Allen Temple healthy and thriving, but to also raise it to the next level. His openness to additional forms of communication—blogs, the Internet, Facebook and other forms of digital media, show that Pastor Smith, Jr. is a pastor with the openness to new ideas and approaches. In my opinion, it is this kind of openness that will result in a greater number of new, and younger members, and that will foster a spirit of ownership and participation that our church badly needs.

How then will Pastor Smith, Jr. bring about this vision. To be fair, exactly what Pastor Smith, Jr.’s vision is for the future, remains a bit unclear as he was deliberately vague in the recent series of town meetings on the topic. Comforting, however, was the fact that Pastor Smith, Jr., if appointed, would first call for 40 days for prayer and reflection, where we would both ask God for those things we desire for our church and spend time “listening” to God guide us as to where he wants us to go. It is through such a thoughtful process argues Pastor Smith, Jr. that our vision will become clear, just as it was, at one time, for Moses and his people. He recites that not only did Moses hear the “vision”, but so did the people. I believe this approach shows Pastor Smith, Jr. is intelligent, yet humble. Pastor Smith, Jr. would have us further complement the above approach with engaging in a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analysis for the church. I applaud the rigor of this approach. I believe before Allen Temple can experience true success, we must fist be honest with ourselves about where and what we are as a church. Then and only then, may we plot a deliberate course toward our future. Where this secular approach falls short, I have faith that Pastor Smith, Jr. will fill in the gaps through his faith, spirituality and leadership.

Despite the foregoing, there will be those who remain miffed at the process by which this selection took place. I would urge anyone with this view to please separate the candidate and the process, after all the candidate followed the process, not created it. Second, we elected a pulpit committee who has spent countless hours judging these candidates against objective criteria to set forth the best one for our consideration. The question of why only one finalist versus three is being presented to the membership of Allen Temple is one for the American Baptist College, Progressive Convention. Allen Temple is a member of this convention. The Progressive Convention clearly sets forth how this process is to be carried out. This process is based on statistical data of several churches. Our Pulpit Committee followed the process set forth faithfully. I urge people who otherwise feel that Pastor Smith, Jr. is the right candidate for our church, to separate him from any views on the process, because to do otherwise is to potentially end up with a new pastor, yet have a divided church. We know from history that a house divided will turn on and potentially destroy itself. I believe if we all line up behind Pastor Smith, Jr., should he be elected, Pastor Smith, Jr., Allen Temple and each of us stands the best chance of success for creating and enjoying a great church. Even should we fall a bit short on this account, I have faith that Pastor Smith, Jr. will unite us. As the Lord told Peter “Pastor my sheep”. The Lord meant all sheep, not just the sheep Peter liked, or those who agreed with Peter. I believe Pastor Smith will embrace and lead us all.

In uncertain times such as these, where among other things, lack of money and loss of housing and jobs are leading people to question their faith, we need a leader who can both feed our souls and help us build our communities back to prosperity. We need a 21st century leader who is energetic, committed and accessible. We must have a leader, a Senior Pastor who has the vision and desire to lead not just some, but all members of Allen Temple. That leader should be J. Alfred Smith, Jr.

To those still struggling with the decision, pray, then allow yourself to walk by faith.