Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Friendly Fire—How a One Time Insider Threatens to Undo an Historic Process, Jeremiah Wright, Simply Wrong, by Bryan R. Parker

Friendly Fire a term originally adopted by the United States military, is fire from allied or friendly forces, as opposed to fire coming from enemy forces or enemy fire. This term may best be seen as an oxymoron. That is “fire” whether coming from allied or enemy forces is still deadly. In this context, there is no real concept of friendly fire. I submit that Senator Obama has been hit by “fire”, and the source of that fire, friendly or allied is starting to be damaging, heading toward being deadly, to the most promising Presidental campaign of my lifetime. I for one, would like to see it stop.

I am very saddened by the recent words and appearances of the Reverend Jeremiah Wright. It seems, for some inexplicable reason, that this man simply will not fade from the public consciousness. I am puzzled as to why, especially when he knows full well the impact his words and appearances are having on the campaign of Senator Obama. I share Senator Obama’s outrage and sadness that Reverened Wright would pick now to take center stage in a debate that is not about Reverened Wright. It is not even about Senators Clinton, Obama or McCain, but as Senator Obama states it is about “[P]eople wanting some help in stabilizing their lives and securing a better future for themselves and their children…” This is the fundamental message of change of Senator Obama’s campaign. This message of change should be the central point in our debate. Not the silly comments of an aging pastor who is fighting his own irrelevance.

If it is not about Jeremiah Wright wanting to maintain his relevance, what then? Is he mad that Senator Obama had to distance himself from the reverend? Senator Obama was right to distance himself from Reverend Wright. He was right to distance himself, not for political gain as Reverend Wright asserts, but because the comments of Reverend Wright were and are wrong. These comments are divisive and antithetical to the politics of change and unity. The change that Senator Obama promises will be beneficial to all, to be sure, but especially blacks and other disenfranchised groups. As such, shouldn’t Reverend Wright be embracing this message, and supporting the campaign, even if it means, as it does here, taking a backseat and staying out of the limelight? If Senator Obama made any mistake it was not denouncing Reverend Wright sooner and more strongly. In his previous remarks he said “he could no more denounce Reverend Wright than he could his white grandmother”. I respectfully submit that someone who says “God damn America” and after the September 11 bombings stated that it was a case of “American chickens coming home to roost” can and should be denounced, and in the strongest terms possible. Senator Obama may therefore rightly be accused of being too loyal, however, this still does not excuse the actions of Reverend Wright.

Jeremiah Wright said in a recent sermon that “[he] is sick of Negros who do not get it….being a black man in America, controlled by rich white people is hard”. Yes, I agree, being black in America is still hard, but getting better. If the Reverend Wright “got it” he would not be so quick to provide fodder to the Clinton and McCain campaigns. Senator Obama has undertaken a task some thought was impossible—becoming the first African American President of the United States. Senator Obama has done a fine job. Reverend Wright is also correct in that blacks in this country still have to be a step better to achieve acknowledgement and success. Senator Obama has been better. Now, when he can use all the support he can get, especially from the African American community, one should not expect that another African American, especially one who claims to love and care for Senator Obama, would give fodder to the opposition. The opposition, Senators Clinton and McCain, are clearly looking for anything they can to undermine this historic campaign. It is against this back drop that I am reminded of one of my favorite Gospel Songs—“Hide Me”. The song asks God to hide me from the enemy. Near the end, the song says “hide me o Lord, even if the enemy is me”. Reverend Wright should heed the words of this song, exit center stage and allow this historic campaign to get back to the real issues—change for America and its citizens.

Allow me to close with Galatians 5:7 “Ye did run well; who did hinder you that ye should not obey the truth”. The bible teaches us that the path of the righteous man is beset on all sides be treachery and the tyranny of evil men. Galatians reminds us that even when the path to victory is impeded, we still have an obligation to stay faithful to the right path. Fortunately, we have a candidate, Senator Barack Obama that gets this concept. I praise Senator Obama for continuing to rise above these politics of negativity and staying focused on his message of bringing change for our country. Thank you Senator for not succumbing to this “friendly fire”. We can only hope that those engaging in this “friendly fire” get the message as well.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Oh so accurate... but there is a bit of good news on this front... Sen. Obama's popularity appears to be un-phased by the latest focus on Jeremiah Wright.

http://tinyurl.com/6zoj9k

(NOTE: you may have to copy & paste into your browser)

I also want to share a few words from a good friend of mine who shares the same sentiment:

"It is dissapointing, though, to watch a Black preacher stab a former member of his flock in the back.

Jeremiah Wright claims to be defending the Black Church," but he seems more focused on defending himself, grabbing headlines, and promoting his book. Mostly, though, he's proven that you can count on a Black pastor to do a lot of things, but shutting up is not among them. Ecclesiastes 3:1 says "There is a time for everything, and a season for every activity under heaven." Apparently, there is a time to preach and a time to shut up. It is time for us to tell Wright that his time has passed.

Senator Obama was wrong when he said that Wright is like a crazy uncle. My crazy uncles know how to act in public. They know when to shut up, and most importantly, not one of them would dream of hurting my career for personal gain. My crazy uncles care more about the success of the next generation than they do about their own future. None of these statements apply to the current Jeremiah Wright. Calling him a crazy uncle is an insult to crazy uncles!"

Anonymous said...

Bryan Parker's blog is exactly the correct message. I am afraid that the
Reverend Wright has succumbed to his own ego and lost sight of his obligation to
Christ and to his followers. I believe that his "message" is not only hurting
Senator Obama but the image of the "Black Church". I pray that Mr. Parker's
message will indeed be well received by the Rev. Wright and he will "get it".

Cynthia

Anonymous said...

BP you on it!
Oh but I phantom the difference a little. I'm glad this man has chosen April 2008 to bleed his mess across the airways than November 2008. The Clintons is sailing this yacht on a small man made lake! It wont last and when the smoke clears, a few folks will be scratching there head. And it won�t be Obama. Let this pastor fuse burn out. Obama's style has been consistent so far he doesn�t put on gloves to satisfy a hand full of disenchanted folks. There is only a fight if some enters the ring. Our soon to be president don�t have time for that. He�s is only satisfying the media, who is responsible for most of this uproar. It will burn out soon. More importantly, we can not steer this Presidential race as a Black against White campaign. This is about people, all people. This soon to be President is serious about making a change for everyone including the Rev. Wrights of our Great Nation. Brother Wright needs a hug, I need hug, shoot everybody need a hug. But seriously, if it had to happen, I�m glad it�s happing now. We have bigger fish to fry in Nov.

Best regards,
Danny Williams